المصادر والمراجع

  • Alpert, D. (1956), Performance and paralysis: The organizational context of the American research University, Journal of Higher Education, 56 (3), 76–102.
  • Association of American Colleges and Universities, (1985), Integrity in the college curriculum, A report to the academic community, Washington, DC: Author.
  • American Association of University Professors (1940, 1995), AAUP policy documents and reports, Washington, DC: author.
  • Association of American Colleges (1985), Integrity in the college curriculum: A report to the academic community, Washington, DC: Author.
  • Austin, A. E., & Baldwin, R. C. (1992), Faculty collaboration: Enhancing the quality of scholarship and teaching, Washington, DC: ASHE/ERIC Higher Education Report.
  • Baldridge, J. V. (1971), Power and conflict in the University: Research in the sociology of complex organizations, New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Baldwin, R. G., & Krotseng, M. V. (1985), Incentives in the academy: Issues and options, New Directions for Higher Education, No. 51, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Bandura, A. (1977), Social learning theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bee, H. L. (2000), The journey of adulthood (4th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bennett, J. B. (1998), Collegial professionalism: The academy, individualism, and the common good, Phoenix, AZ: Oryx.
  • Bensimon, E. M., & O’Neill, H. F., Jr. (1998), Collaborative effort to measure faculty work, Liberal Education, 84(4).
  • Bensimon, E. M., Ward, K., & Sanders, K. (2000), The department chair’s role in developing new faculty into teachers and scholars, Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Blau, P. M., & Scott, W. R. (1962), Formal organizations: A comparative approach, San Francisco, CA: Chandler.
  • Boyer, E. (1990), Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate, Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
  • Braskamp, L. A. (1997), On being responsive and responsible, CHEA Chronicle No. 6, Washington, DC: Council for Higher Education Accreditation.
  • Braybrooke, D., & Lindblom, C. E. (1963), A strategy of decision, New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Brookfield, S. D. (1995), Becoming a critically reflective teacher, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Burke, J. C. (1999, July/August), The assessment anomaly: If everyone’s doing it why isn’t more getting done? Assessment Update, II, 4.
  • Cervero, R. M., & Wilson, A. L. (1994), Planting responsibly for adult education: A guide to negotiating power and interests, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Clark, B. R. (1987), The academic life: Small worlds, different worlds, Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990), Flow: The psychology of optimal experience, New York, NY: Harper-Collins.
  • Dewey, J. (1933), How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process, Lexington, MA: D. C. Health.
  • Diamond, R. M. (1993), Changing priorities and the faculty reward system, In R. M. Diamond & B. E. Adam (Eds.), Recognizing faculty work: Reward systems for the year 2000, New Directions for Higher Education, No. 81, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Dill, D. D. (1999), Implementing academic audits: Lessons learned in Europe and Asia, Unpublished manuscript, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.
  • Dill, D. D., Massy, W. E., Williams, P. R., & Cook, C. M. (1996, September/October), Accreditation and academic quality assurance: Can we get there from here? Change, 28 (5), 17–24.
  • Eisner, E. W. (1991), The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice, New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Ewell, P. (2002), Evidence guide: A guide to using evidence in the accreditation process, Alameda, CA: Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
  • Fairweather, J. (1996), Faculty work and the public trust: Restoring the value of teaching and public service in American academic life, Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Ferren, A. S., & Slavings, R. (2000), Investing in quality: Tools for improving curricular efficiency, Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
  • Froh, R. C., Menges, R. J., & Walker, C. J. (1993), Revitalizing faculty work through intrinsic rewards, In R. M. Diamond & B. E. Adam (Eds.), Recognizing faculty work: Reward systems for the year 2000 (pp. 87–95), New Directions for Higher Education, No. 81, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Gaff, J. G. Pruit-Logan, A. S., Weibl, R. A., & Associates (2000), Building the faculty we need: Colleges and universities working together, Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
  • Garvin, D. A. (1988), Managing quality: The strategic and competitive edge, New York: NY: Free Press.
  • Gelmon, S. B. (1997), International improvement: The deliberate linage of assessment and accreditation. Presentation to the 1997. AAHE Conference on Assessment and Quality. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
  • Gmelch, W. H. (1995), Department chairs under siege: Resolving the web of conflict, In S. Holton (Ed.), Conflict management in higher education, New Directions for Higher Education, No. 92, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989), Fourth generation evaluation, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Haworth, J. G., & Conrad, C. F. (1997), Emblems of quality in higher education: Developing and sustaining high-quality programs, Needham heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Hecht, I., Higgerson, M. L., Gmelch, W. H., & Tucker, A. (1999), The department chair as academic leader, Phoenix, AZ: Oryx.
  • Holton, S. (Ed.), (1998), Mending the cracks in the ivory tower: Strategies for conflict management in higher educations, Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, James R. Sanders, Chair, (1994), The program evaluation standards: How to assess evaluations of educational programs, Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993, March/April), The discipline of teams, Harvard Business Review, 111–120.
  • Kerr, S. (1975), On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping forB, Academy of Management Journal, 18, 769–783.
  • Knight Higher Education Collaborative (1991, September), An end to sanctuary, Policy Perspectives, 3(4).
  • Knight Higher Education Collaborative (1996, February), Double agent, Policy Perspectives, 6(3).
  • Knight Higher Education Collaborative (2000, March), The data made me do it, Policy Perspectives, 9(2).
  • Kohn, A. (1993), Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A’s, praise, and other bribes, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Langenburg, D. N. (1992, September 2), Team scholarship could help strengthen scholarly traditions, The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A64.
  • Lucas, A. F. (1994), Strengthening departmental leadership: A teambuilding guide for chairs in colleges and universities, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Lucas, A. F., & Associates (2000), Leading academic change: Essential roles for department chairs, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Massy, W. F. (2001, July/August), Making quality work, University Business, 4, 44–50.
  • Massy, W. F., Wilger, A. K., & Colbeck, C. (1994, July/August), Overcoming “Hollowed” collegiality, Change, 26(4), 10–20.
  • McKeachie, W. J. (1993), What we Know about faculty motivation, Presentation to first AAHE Forum on Faculty Roles and Rewards, San Antonio, TX (audiotape).
  • McMillan, J. H., Wergin, J. F., Forsyth, D. R., & Brown, J. C. (1986), Student ratings of instructions: A summary of literature, Instructional Evaluation, 9(1), 2–9.
  • McMillan, L. A., & Berberet. J. (Eds.), (2002), A new academic compact: Revisioning the relationship between faculty and their institutions, Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Menges B., & Associates (1999), Faculty in new jobs: A guide to settling in, becoming established, and building institutional support, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Messick, S. (1994), Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances and scientific inquiry into score meaning, Research Report RR–94–45. ERIC Identifier: ED380496.
  • Mezirow, J. (1990), How critical reflection triggers transformative learning, In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.), Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • National Center for Postsecondary Improvement (1999, September/October), Revolution or evolution? Gauging the impact of institutional student-assessment strategies, Change, 53–56.
  • National Center for Postsecondary Improvement (2000, March/April), Why is research the rule? The impact of incentive systems on faculty behavior, Change, 53–56.
  • National Research Council (2000), How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded edition), Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Palmer, P. J. (1998), The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life, San Francisco, CA: Jossy-Bass.
  • Palomba, C. A., & Banta, T. W. (1999), Assessment essentials: Planning implementing, and improving assessment in higher education, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1990), Qualitative evaluation and research methods, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1997), Utilization-Focused evaluation: The new century text, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Peterson, M. W., & Einarson, M. K. (2001), What are colleges doing about student assessment? Does it make a difference? Journal of Higher Education, 72, 629–669.
  • Pirsig, R. M. (1974), Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance: An inquiry into values, New York, NY: Bantam.
  • Polyani, M. (1967), The tacit dimension, New York, NY: Doubleday.
  • PresKill, H., & Torres, R. T. (1998), Evaluative inquiry for learning in organizations, Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Pruett, E. S. (2001), Restructuring faculty workload: A qualitative study of the effects of faculty role differentiation on senior faculty members perception of the quality of their work lives, Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University.
  • Rice, R. E. (1996), Making a place for the new American scholar, New Pathways: Faculty career and employment for the 21st Century, Working Paper Series, Inquiry No. 1, Washington, DC: AAHE.
  • Schuster, J. H., Wheeler, D. W., & Associates, (1990), Enhancing faculty careers: Strategies for development and renewal, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Seagrenm A. T., Creswell, J. W., & Wheeler, D. W. (1995), The department chair: New roles, responsibilities, and challenges, ASHE–ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 1, Washington, DC: George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development (ED 363 164).
  • Senge, P. M. (2000), The academy as learning community: Contradiction in terms or realizable future? In A. F. Lucas & Associates (Eds.), Leading academic change: Essential roles for department chairs (pp. 275–300), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Seymour, D. T. (1993), On Q: Causing quality in higher education, Phoenix, AZ.: Oryx.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1993), Teaching as community property: Putting and end to pedagogical solitude, Change, 25(6), 6-7.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1995, January), Teaching as community property, Address to AAHE Forum on Faculty Roles and Rewards, San Diego, CA.
  • Smith, V. B. (1998), The futures project: A two-year activity of 18 independent colleges and universities in California, Final report to James Irvine Foundation.
  • Staw, B. M. (1983), Motivation research versus the art of faculty management, In J. L. Bess (Ed.), College and university organization: insigts from the behavioral sciences, New York: NYU Press.
  • Tierney, W. G. (1999), Building the responsive campus: Creating high performance colleges and universities, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Tompkins, J. P. (1992, November/December), The way we live now, Change, 24, 12–19.
  • Trower, C., Austin, A., & Sorcinelli, M. (2001, May), Paradise lost: How the academy converts enthusiastic recruits into early-career doubters, AAHE Bulletin, 53(9), 3–6.
  • Tucker, A. (1993), Chairing the academic department (3rd ed.), Washington, DC: American Council on Education Oryx.
  • United States Office of Scientific Research and Development (1945), Science, the endless frontier: A report to the President by Vannevar Bush, Washington, DC: Author.
  • University of California at Los Angeles Higher Education Research Institute (1997), The American College teacher: National Norms for the 1995-96 HERI faculty survey, Los Angeles, CA: Author.
  • Walvoord, B. E., Carey, A. K., Smith, H. L., Soled, S. W., Way, P. K., & Zorn, D. (2000), Academic departments: How they work, how they change, ASHE–ERIC Higher Education Report, 27 (8), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Wergin, J. F. (1976), Evaluation of organizational policymaking: A political model, Review of Educational Research, 46(1), 75–115.
  • Wergin, J. F. (1994), The collaborative department: How five campuses are inching toward cultures of collective responsibility, Washington, DC: AAHE.
  • Wergin, J. F. (1998), Assessment of programs and units, Presentation at the 1998 AAHE Assessment Conference, Reprinted in Architecture for change: Information as foundation, Washington, DC: AAHE.
  • Wergin, J. F., & Swingen, J. N. (2000), Departmental assessment: How some colleges are effectively evaluating the collective work of faculty, Washington, DC: AAHE.
  • Zemsky, R., & Massy, W. F. (1993, May/June), On reversing the ratchet: Restructuring in colleges and universities, Change, 25, 56–62.

جميع الحقوق محفوظة لمؤسسة هنداوي © ٢٠٢٤